Lewis K. Cato and Lewis K. Cato, Administrator of the Estate of Johnnie P. Cato, Deceased v. United States of America, Francis J. Dwyer and Wife, Elizabeth C. Dwyer v. United States

442 F.2d 927
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 30, 1971
Docket31050
StatusPublished

This text of 442 F.2d 927 (Lewis K. Cato and Lewis K. Cato, Administrator of the Estate of Johnnie P. Cato, Deceased v. United States of America, Francis J. Dwyer and Wife, Elizabeth C. Dwyer v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lewis K. Cato and Lewis K. Cato, Administrator of the Estate of Johnnie P. Cato, Deceased v. United States of America, Francis J. Dwyer and Wife, Elizabeth C. Dwyer v. United States, 442 F.2d 927 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

442 F.2d 927

Lewis K. CATO and Lewis K. Cato, Administrator of the Estate of Johnnie P. Cato, deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Francis J. DWYER and Wife, Elizabeth C. Dwyer, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 31050.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 30, 1971.

David E. Hicks, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Wayman G. Sherrer, U. S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, Chief, Appellate Sec., Stephan Schwarz, Gilbert E. Andrews, Atty., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellee.

Before TUTTLE, WISDOM and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We conclude that it would require an extreme distortion in both legislative policy and the language effecting it to hold that the trial court erred in holding in favor of the United States in this federal income tax case by directing a verdict for the government.

We agree with the trial court that the gain portion of sums withdrawn by the taxpayers from pledged savings accounts assigned to them do not qualify for long-term capital gains treatment for tax purposes (see Redak v. Commissioner, 27 TCM 1053 [1968]).

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cato v. United States
442 F.2d 927 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
442 F.2d 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-k-cato-and-lewis-k-cato-administrator-of-the-estate-of-johnnie-p-ca5-1971.