Lewis Harm Ash v. David Ford Randy Simons Lee Bollinger Steven Young Joe F. Britt
This text of 16 F.3d 408 (Lewis Harm Ash v. David Ford Randy Simons Lee Bollinger Steven Young Joe F. Britt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
16 F.3d 408
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lewis Harm ASH, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
David FORD; Randy Simons; Lee Bollinger; Steven Young;
Joe F. Britt, Defendants Appellees.
No. 93-7014.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec, 16, 1993.
Decided Jan. 13, 1994.
Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his post-judgment motions. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ash v. Ford, No. CA-93-422-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 F.3d 408, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7254, 1994 WL 7205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-harm-ash-v-david-ford-randy-simons-lee-bolli-ca4-1994.