Lewis County v. Texas County

588 S.W.2d 750, 1979 Mo. App. LEXIS 2578
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 10, 1979
DocketNo. 11034
StatusPublished

This text of 588 S.W.2d 750 (Lewis County v. Texas County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lewis County v. Texas County, 588 S.W.2d 750, 1979 Mo. App. LEXIS 2578 (Mo. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

BILLINGS, Presiding Judge.

Suit to quiet title to 120 acres of land located in Texas County. The trial court found and determined title to the tract was in Texas County and quieted title accordingly. We reverse and remand with directions.

Plaintiff Lewis County based its claim of title on an indemnity patent from the United States to the State of Missouri and a patent from the State of Missouri to Lewis County, both patents arising out of federal and state swamp land legislation. Inherent in the trial court’s ruling is that the 120-acre tract in Texas County was swamp land1 under United States and Missouri law.

In 1850 the Congress of the United States enacted what is commonly referred to as the Swamp Land Act of 1850.2 Swamp and overflowed lands in Arkansas and the other States of the Union were granted to said States. Inter alia, the Secretary of the Interior was directed to make out a list and plats of such lands, transmit the same to the governors of the states involved, and, at the request of the governors, cause patents to be issued to the respective states of such swamp and overflowed lands.

In 1855 Congress passed an “Act for the Relief of Purchasers and Locators of Swamp and Overflowed Lands.” 3 In summary this law provided that purchasers and locators of swamp and overflowed lands who had made entries of such public lands prior to the issuance of patents by the states involved were entitled to have patents issued by the United States. Section 2 of this Act, applicable to this case, provided: “That upon due proof . . . that any of the lands purchased were swamp lands . the purchase-money shall be paid over to the said State or States; and where the lands have been located by warrant or scrip,4 the said State or States shall be authorized to locate a quantity of like amount, upon any of the public lands subject to entry . .” (Our emphasis).

[752]*752Another Act of Congress in 1857 5 confirmed the selection of swamp and overflowed lands granted to the States by the Swamp Land Act of 1850 “so far as the [swamp lands] shall remain vacant and unappropriated, and not interfered with by an actual settlement under any existing law of the United States,” and continued in force the Act of 1855.

The Missouri Legislature, shortly after passage of the Swamp Land Act of 1850, began enacting legislation relative to the swamp lands located within Missouri. Woodson, P. J., in the scholarly and informative opinion, cited in footnote 4, traces the various laws passed by our General Assembly which culminated in the Missouri Swamp Land Act of 18686 and now found in Chapter 241, RSMo 1978.

In this case defendant Texas County contended, and the trial court found, that the title to the 120-acre tract passed to Missouri under the United States Swamp Land Acts of 1850 and 1855 and was automatically transferred to Texas County by the Missouri Swamp Land Act of 1868. We disagree.

As noted earlier, the trial court’s conclusion is necessarily bottomed upon the assumption that the 120-acre tract of Texas County land was swamp land. The record is devoid of any evidence to support such an assumption and there is no patent from any government, federal or state, to Texas County. Conversely, the only evidence demonstrates Lewis County received a patent to the subject property from the State of Missouri as indemnity for swamp land pursuant to the indemnity provision found in Section 2 of the Congressional Swamp Land Acts of 1855 and 1857, and Sections 25 and 26 of Missouri’s Swamp Land Act of 1868.

Indemnity Patent No. 3, issued November 4,1872, by the United States to the State of Missouri, inter alia, states:

“And Whereas, in pursuance of said Acts of March 2,1855, and March 3,1857, a Special Certificate, numbered three, and dated the Sixth day of December, 1869, has been issued by the Commissioner of the General Land Office, Authoriz[753]*753ing the State of Missouri to locate the quantity of one hundred and twenty acres, (120) as the indemnity contemplated by the Second Section of the aforesaid Act of March 2,1855, and the said certificate having been returned to the General Land Office accompanied by a list showing the selection in satisfaction thereof of the lands hereinafter described, situate in the District of Lands Subject to Sale at Ironton, Missouri, to wit: [describing the subject lands].”

The patent from the State of Missouri to Lewis County, issued December 20, 1872, is as follows:

“Whereas, Under the Acts of Congress of September 28,1850, entitled ‘An Act to enable the State of Arkansas and other States to reclaim the Swamp Lands within their limits,’ and of March 2, 1855, entitled ‘An Act for the Relief of Purchasers and Locators of Swamp and Overflowed Lands;’ also of March 3, 1857, entitled ‘An Act to confirm to the several States the Swamp and Overflowed Lands, selected under the act of September 28, 1850,’ the following described lands have been patented by the United States to the State of Missouri, on the Fourth day of November, 1872, Patent No. 3; and
“Whereas, by Section 1 of an act of the State of Missouri, approved March 27, 1868, entitled ‘LANDS-SWAMP,’ the Swamp and Overflowed Lands were donated to the several counties wherein they are situated, and
“Whereas, Under the provisions of Section 25 of the aforesaid act, the following described lands were located as ‘Indemnity’ for Swamp and Overflowed Lands, situated in Lewis county, to wit: Township Thirty-three (33) North of Range Ten (10) West (Ironton District) The Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section Twenty (20) and the East half of the Northeast Quarter of Section Twenty-nine (29) containing in the aggregate One hundred and Twenty acres (120).
“NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW YE, That the State of Missouri, in consideration of the premises, and in conformity with the act of the General Assembly aforesaid, Has Given and Granted, and by these presents Does Give and Grant unto the said county of Lewis, in fee simple, subject to the disposal of the County Court thereof, and subject also to the various restrictions of law, the tracts of land above described; To Have and to Hold the same together with all the rights, privileges, immunities and appurtenances thereto belonging, unto the said county of Lewis in fee simple, and to its assigns forever.”

The patent was signed by the Governor, Register of Lands, and Secretary of State and duly recorded in the Indemnity Swamp Land Patents record.

The patents are prima facie evidence that all the required statutory steps, federal and state, were taken. Cramer v. Keller, 98 Mo. 279, 11 S.W. 734 (1889). The United States patent shows the State of Missouri was permitted to select 120 acres of public lands in lieu of and as indemnity for Lewis County swamp lands which had previously been purchased or located. The patent from the State of Missouri demonstrates that Missouri had relinquished the Lewis County swamp lands, as specifically authorized under Section 24 of the Missouri Act, in return for 120 acres of other public lands, as provided for in the indemnity section of the Federal Act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)
Cramer v. Keller
98 Mo. 279 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1889)
Simpson v. Stoddard County
73 S.W. 700 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1903)
Morgan v. Stoddard
86 S.W. 133 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1905)
Russ v. Sims
169 S.W. 69 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
588 S.W.2d 750, 1979 Mo. App. LEXIS 2578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-county-v-texas-county-moctapp-1979.