Lewis County v. State Bank

170 P. 100, 31 Idaho 251, 1918 Ida. LEXIS 19
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lewis County v. State Bank. Read the opinion of the Court — 31 Idaho 244
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided January 7, 1918·Published

Opinion

BUDGE, C. J.

This is a companion case to Lewis County, State of Idaho, a Municipal Corporation, and Luther T. McKee, Treasurer of Lewis County, State of Idaho, Appellant, v. State Bank of Peck, a Corporation, Respondent, ante, p. 214, 170 Pac. 98, the difference between the two cases being that the latter ease was an action in claim and delivery to recover certain notes, whereas this ease is an action for money had and received to recover the proceeds of certain of the notes which had been collected by the. respondent bank.

By stipulation both actions were tried as one, all of the evidence was introduced in the other case and but one record was made. Upon the authority of that case this cause is remanded with instructions to modify the judgment entered herein in like manner, and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed. Costs awarded to respondent.

Morgan, J., dissents. Bice, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis County v. State Bank, 170 P. 100, 31 Idaho 251, 1918 Ida. LEXIS 19 (Idaho 1918).

170 P. 100 (Lewis County v. State Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lewis County v. State Bank
170 P. 98 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1918)