Lewis, Cedrick Bernard

Opinion

PD-1115-15

0& 6fa\-(V*u*ep^ ftt-V^^

f'U<V yw

CeO<mcK LfvftS

RECEIVED „„

-(NO i r> n -? U09 COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS

b^ &W £ftL ^tA Vnt 1W ^Ald aL CtsVfSxcT C£>uA"T AbelAcosia.Cleri.

•iLO.13

4a*b 6aps tV • e^^Mrri

"Ta&Le b£ C<*>1k*Ts p^ ^6d

9x\ftYk^ vV, vv ,%VV*>NS V^ VVS IV»t 13

^W

UsT J QlaTUc^xTxES

Qpffc vW.

W. S-T^s^ W. O*. S^ ,MSfc (lex. Qs. P$. 111$ 11 sTftTuT^s*. ?a1e ^.

^HftS^^ftLCeAtf Sec.~Wafc.64x xvx x. xx » • . mIO

t^i~i.

Vtffe vJfi.u

.?,

^.VWE

'cftPxAxice s

^u'ftisV WRi>W.i"U Q 1&CAS Rules rf^WW£-?WU»xft%.IWt-^*<«fe

<«*ftl9«&<?«*A% Cartel'. CAbui 0. 1^-VftLL n fcntftsTLAd.vS'TReelx^iil-te.^

^bcsxwvxIe". C<k~ft TJa-aauW /(x\lflLS"TftTEbC6a»4'=,£V. ^u . n . J2b.\ I nbLVEp

iWh»^.! (fl^ <7AV Woo

^cs^ik; Clo^ 103- 7919

?PtS3iMiU (TV'S Til- 44TM

^EleW^f. fte") "13.^-7^6

M>i^*W"~Su<^M6^ WiUfoi .*.£***- £a<vibto-

•3.P we

ST<\tavx.fc.KfT tJ TWe Case.,.

WR eMwfT vJfcS \vxA\ckA UCft^t vWb>«- 7>lWxoftk Wxt *?&*&* sS

\$M, f\\W^ Vk VlMt- &ccia(M&2 c^ CW^s. Vix a<M~V« xo fWkt&ti

io.|h^ \t,»oi4 4W Cau^ x£i<^. 1?^ 4& A-3v*f.ffr- -Su*.?

£m^A ^t\\m\^'M^\\i ten i^aluA^ cVxeR^tei^

J W^VA <W*W U*^* xA^oC^W^

Q>.h%