Lewine v. National City Bank of New York

164 N.E. 571, 249 N.Y. 528, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 866

New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 23, 1928·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence of custom offered on the trial was properly excluded.

The court, therefore, adheres to its prior decision. (Lewine v. National City Bank, 248 N. Y. 365.)

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Pound, Crane, Andrews, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur; Cardqzo, Ch. J., and Lehman, J., dissent.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The evidence of custom offered on the trial was properly excluded.

The court, therefore, adheres to its prior decision. (Lewine v. National City Bank, 248 N. Y. 365.)

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Pound, Crane, Andrews, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur; Cardqzo, Ch. J., and Lehman, J., dissent.

Judgment affirmed.

Lewine v. National City Bank of New York, 164 N.E. 571, 249 N.Y. 528, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 866 (N.Y. 1928).

Pincite

164 N.E. 571 (Lewine v. National City Bank of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

162 N.E. 284 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)