Lewin v. Brown Drive It Yourself Corp.
155 Misc. 225, 280 N.Y.S. 912, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1806
Opinion
After the litigation had terminated and the proceeds received for the benefit of the infant had been deposited with [226]*226the city chamberlain the court had no power to direct payment thereof to the guardian ad litem. Nor do we find any provision of law dispensing with the giving of the bond required by rule 41 of the Rules of Civil Practice under the circumstances which the record discloses.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
All concur; present, Levy, Callahan and Untermyer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lewin v. Brown Drive It Yourself Corp., 155 Misc. 225, 280 N.Y.S. 912, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
155 Misc. 225 (Lewin v. Brown Drive It Yourself Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nicolosi v. Olshansky
166 Misc. 55 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1938)