Lewin & Sons, Inc. v. Framularo

270 A.2d 543, 159 Conn. 611
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 26, 1970·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case the court concluded that the mortgage sought to be foreclosed was invalid and not properly authorized by the corporation purporting to be the mortgagor. The plaintiff has not assigned error in the court’s conclusion, nor does its assignment of errors raise any other issue of law which may be reviewed by this court. The lack of such an assignment of error is fatal to the plaintiff’s appeal. Practice Book § 652; Charlton Press, Inc. v. Sullivan, 153 Conn. 103, 113, 214 A.2d 354; Maltbie, Conn. App. Proc. § 167. The claims of error which the plaintiff does raise are addressed to findings of fact made by the court and are necessarily irrelevant since there are no issues of law properly before us. See Practice Book §§ 622, 628; Martin v. Kavanewsky, 157 Conn. 514, 516, 255 A.2d 619; Maltbie, op. cit. § 157.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewin & Sons, Inc. v. Framularo, 270 A.2d 543, 159 Conn. 611 (Colo. 1970).

270 A.2d 543 (Lewin & Sons, Inc. v. Framularo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Charlton Press, Inc. v. Sullivan
214 A.2d 354 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1965)
Martin v. Kavanewsky
255 A.2d 619 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1969)