Lewandoski v. Lewandoski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lewandoski v. Lewandoski

278 A.D. 1004, 105 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5485

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 29, 1951

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 278 A.D. 1004 (Lewandoski v. Lewandoski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lewandoski v. Lewandoski, 278 A.D. 1004, 105 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5485 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from that part of an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Albany County Special Term which denied appellant’s motion for a judgment for arrears in the payment of alimony, and reduced current payments to $15 a week. The solution of the issues involved in these motions was in the sound discretion of the court at Special Term (Civ. Prae. Act, § 1171-b). We may only interfere where it is plainly apparent that such discretion was abused, and in our opinion such an abuse of discretion does not appear from the record herein. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Brewster, Deyo, Bergan and Coon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from that part of an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Albany County Special Term which denied appellant’s motion for a judgment for arrears in the payment of alimony, and reduced current payments to $15 a week. The solution of the issues involved in these motions was in the sound discretion of the court at Special Term (Civ. Prae. Act, § 1171-b). We may only interfere where it is plainly apparent that such discretion was abused, and in our opinion such an abuse of discretion does not appear from the record herein. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Brewster, Deyo, Bergan and Coon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 A.D. 1004, 105 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewandoski-v-lewandoski-nyappdiv-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack