Lew v. Manhasset Public Library

123 A.D.3d 1096, 999 N.Y.S.2d 527
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 31, 2014
Docket2013-10066
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 123 A.D.3d 1096 (Lew v. Manhasset Public Library) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lew v. Manhasset Public Library, 123 A.D.3d 1096, 999 N.Y.S.2d 527 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Marber, J.), entered August 8, 2013, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff allegedly tripped and fell when she was walking down an aisle of the defendants’ library. As the plaintiff walked down the aisle, there were bookshelves to her left and tables and chairs to her right. The plaintiff came across a book cart in the aisle and, as she walked around the book cart, she allegedly tripped and fell on the leg of a chair. The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants to recover damages for personal injuries and, thereafter, the defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The Supreme Court granted the defendants’ motion.

*1097 The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the book cart and the chair were open and obvious and not inherently dangerous (see Koepke v Deer Hills Hardware, Inc, 118 AD3d 957 [2014]; Flaim v Hex Food, Inc., 79 AD3d 797 [2010]; Stern v Costco Wholesale, 63 AD3d 1139 [2009]; Neiderbach v 7-Eleven, Inc., 56 AD3d 632 [2008]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Austin and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bartholomew v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
2018 NY Slip Op 1590 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Gerner v. Shop-Rite of Uniondale, Inc.
2017 NY Slip Op 2407 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Mullen v. Helen Keller Services for the Blind
135 A.D.3d 837 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 A.D.3d 1096, 999 N.Y.S.2d 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lew-v-manhasset-public-library-nyappdiv-2014.