Lew v. Lamia
This text of 270 A.D.2d 395 (Lew v. Lamia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant MBM General Contracting, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated March 1, 1999, which denied its motion for leave to vacate an order of the same court (Polizzi, J.), dated November 16, 1998, entered upon its default in answering the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
It is well settled that a party moving to vacate an order entered upon its default must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense to the action (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 NY2d 138; Domenikos v Miranda, 255 AD2d 481; Roussodimou v Zafiriadis, 238 AD2d 568). Neither was shown here. Bracken, J. P., Joy, Thompson, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 A.D.2d 395, 705 N.Y.S.2d 254, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lew-v-lamia-nyappdiv-2000.