Levys, L., Pet v.
This text of Levys, L., Pet v. (Levys, L., Pet v.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
LINCOLN DAVE LEVYS, JR., : No. 33 WM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : JOSEPH K. WILLIAMS, III, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth
v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permitted).
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to
strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Levys, L., Pet v., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levys-l-pet-v-pa-2017.