Levy v. Zeman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Levy v. Zeman

35 Misc. 822, 72 N.Y.S. 1116

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Misc. 822 (Levy v. Zeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levy v. Zeman, 35 Misc. 822, 72 N.Y.S. 1116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence would have justified a judgment against both defendants. It was. upon the appellant’s own motion that no judgment was' rendered against the codefendant. He cannot now be heard to object that his motion was granted. The judgment was not against the weight of evidence. The defendant’s story that the services were rendered as a matter of courtesy only is most improbable.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The evidence would have justified a judgment against both defendants. It was. upon the appellant’s own motion that no judgment was' rendered against the codefendant. He cannot now be heard to object that his motion was granted. The judgment was not against the weight of evidence. The defendant’s story that the services were rendered as a matter of courtesy only is most improbable.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Misc. 822, 72 N.Y.S. 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levy-v-zeman-nyappterm-1901.