Levy v. Vantines, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Levy v. Vantines, Inc.

7 A.D.2d 632, 180 N.Y.S.2d 243, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4147

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 25, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 632 (Levy v. Vantines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levy v. Vantines, Inc., 7 A.D.2d 632, 180 N.Y.S.2d 243, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Order appealed' from unanimously modified in the exercise of discretion to the extent of deleting subdivision (a) from the third decretal paragraph and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-appellant. The provisions of subdivision (a) are too broad and do not appear to concern matters relevant to the examination. It is directed that the testimony of Bayshore Industries, Incorporated, through Alvin L. Gursha, its president, be taken before Arthur B. Colwin, Esq., at his office, room 407, 370 Lexington Avenue, Borough of [633]*633Manhattan, City of New York, on the 5th day of December, 1958 at 10 o’clock in the forenoon and that said examination continue from day to day until completed. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order appealed' from unanimously modified in the exercise of discretion to the extent of deleting subdivision (a) from the third decretal paragraph and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-appellant. The provisions of subdivision (a) are too broad and do not appear to concern matters relevant to the examination. It is directed that the testimony of Bayshore Industries, Incorporated, through Alvin L. Gursha, its president, be taken before Arthur B. Colwin, Esq., at his office, room 407, 370 Lexington Avenue, Borough of [633]*633Manhattan, City of New York, on the 5th day of December, 1958 at 10 o’clock in the forenoon and that said examination continue from day to day until completed. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 632, 180 N.Y.S.2d 243, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levy-v-vantines-inc-nyappdiv-1958.