Levy v. Rubin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Levy v. Rubin

182 S.E. 176, 181 Ga. 187, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 53

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 30, 1935

DocketNo. 10760

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 182 S.E. 176 (Levy v. Rubin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levy v. Rubin, 182 S.E. 176, 181 Ga. 187, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 53 (Ga. 1935).

Pincite

Opinions

Bell, Justice.

Where an unmarried man, who is the head of a family which consists of himself, a widowed mother, and two sisters, one of whom is unmarried, furnishes and maintains an automobile for the purpose of being used by the members of the family for their pleasure and comfort, and where, while on a particular occasion with the specific authority and consent of the brother, thé automobile is being run and operated by the unmarried sister for her comfort and pleasure and the comfort and pleasure of her friends at the time accompanying her in the automobile, another person is injured and damaged as the proximate result of the negligence of the sister in operating the automobile under the circumstances, the unmarried brother is liable for such injuries. See Hubert v. Harpe, 181 Ga. 168 (182 S. E. —).

All the Justices concur, except A.t7dnson and Gilbert, JJ., who dissent, and Bussell, O. J., absent for providential cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Justice.

Where an unmarried man, who is the head of a family which consists of himself, a widowed mother, and two sisters, one of whom is unmarried, furnishes and maintains an automobile for the purpose of being used by the members of the family for their pleasure and comfort, and where, while on a particular occasion with the specific authority and consent of the brother, thé automobile is being run and operated by the unmarried sister for her comfort and pleasure and the comfort and pleasure of her friends at the time accompanying her in the automobile, another person is injured and damaged as the proximate result of the negligence of the sister in operating the automobile under the circumstances, the unmarried brother is liable for such injuries. See Hubert v. Harpe, 181 Ga. 168 (182 S. E. —).

All the Justices concur, except A.t7dnson and Gilbert, JJ., who dissent, and Bussell, O. J., absent for providential cause.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 S.E. 176, 181 Ga. 187, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levy-v-rubin-ga-1935.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack