Levy v. Rothfeld
This text of 271 A.D.2d 973 (Levy v. Rothfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for specific performance of an agreement for the sale of real property, defendant Charlotte Falk’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was denied. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Hagarty, Acting P. J., concurs but adheres to his views expressed in Joehl v. Tricarico (ante, p. 898); Nolan, J., dissents and votes to reverse and to grant the motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 A.D.2d 973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levy-v-rothfeld-nyappdiv-1947.