Levy v. Roberts
Opinion
The defendant, paying money over to the sheriff, on an execution, cannot be considered as paying it voluntarily ; and if improperly paid, the sheriff, upon a rule may be ordered to pay it back.
Where the plaintiff’s demand has been reduced by actual payments, to a sum within the Summary Process jurisdiction, he must proceed by way of Summary Process for the balance ; and if he bring his action for the Vkhole, he can recover only the costs of a Summary Process. But it is otherwise where there are mutual demands, and the plaintiff's debt is reduced by discount; because he may not know the amount of the defendant’s demand; neither can he know that he will avail himself of such defence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
12 S.C.L. 395 (Levy v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.