Levy v. Providence & Stonington S. S. Co.

123 F. 347, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4906
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedApril 17, 1903
StatusPublished

This text of 123 F. 347 (Levy v. Providence & Stonington S. S. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Levy v. Providence & Stonington S. S. Co., 123 F. 347, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4906 (S.D.N.Y. 1903).

Opinion

COXE, Circuit Judge.

I can see no way to sustain the verdict, which was for nominal damages only. The view most favorable to the defendant is that the jury found that the conduct of the plaintiff in violating the rules of the boat warranted his removal, but that the defendant’s employés used unnecessary force.

There can be no pretense that the nominal sum of $i is sufficient to compensate the plaintiff for the injury occasioned by this excessive use of force, and for the indignity of the subsequent imprisonment of at least half an hour.

The verdict is inconsistent and illogical. The motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 F. 347, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levy-v-providence-stonington-s-s-co-nysd-1903.