Levy v. Order of the Iron Hall
38 A. 18, 67 N.H. 593
Opinion
As the plaintiff did not resort to the remedy of appeal provided by His contract, he cannot maintain this action. However unreasonable the multiplicity of appeals within the order may seem, he had a right to make an unreasonable contract, and cannot enforce it without complying -with its express conditions.
Judgment for the defendants.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Levy v. Order of the Iron Hall, 38 A. 18, 67 N.H. 593 (N.H. 1892).
38 A. 18 (Levy v. Order of the Iron Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nadeau v. St. Albans Aerie
26 A.2d 93 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1942)
King v. Wynema Council No. 10
78 A. 845 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1911)
McGuinness v. Court Elm City, Foresters of America
60 A. 1023 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1905)
Cotter v. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W.
57 P. 650 (Montana Supreme Court, 1899)