Levy v. New York Life Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Levy v. New York Life Insurance

159 Misc. 431, 286 N.Y.S. 905, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1733

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJune 1, 1935

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 159 Misc. 431 (Levy v. New York Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levy v. New York Life Insurance, 159 Misc. 431, 286 N.Y.S. 905, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1733 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Wasservogel, J.

On the conceded facts the disability benefits which would have been due and owing to the insured, Samuel L. Levy, had he lived and remained disabled until October 22, November 16 and November 20, 1934, the respective anniversary dates of the policies of insurance here involved, never matured. Levy died on October 18, 1934, and no right of action existed on his part during his life to collect disability benefits from defendant. His death terminated the right of action which would have matured under the policies on the dates mentioned had he lived and remained disabled until said dates.

Plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings denied. Defendant’s cross-motion made on the argument granted. Settle order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wasservogel, J.

On the conceded facts the disability benefits which would have been due and owing to the insured, Samuel L. Levy, had he lived and remained disabled until October 22, November 16 and November 20, 1934, the respective anniversary dates of the policies of insurance here involved, never matured. Levy died on October 18, 1934, and no right of action existed on his part during his life to collect disability benefits from defendant. His death terminated the right of action which would have matured under the policies on the dates mentioned had he lived and remained disabled until said dates.

Plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings denied. Defendant’s cross-motion made on the argument granted. Settle order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 Misc. 431, 286 N.Y.S. 905, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levy-v-new-york-life-insurance-nysupct-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack