Levy v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Levy v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

34 Misc. 518, 69 N.Y.S. 973

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Misc. 518 (Levy v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levy v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co., 34 Misc. 518, 69 N.Y.S. 973 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Bischoff, P. J.

An appeal from an interlocutory judgment lies to the General Term (Code, § 3189), but not to the Supreme Court from the determination of the General Term upon that appeal, where final judgment is not directed. Code, § 3191, subd. 1; Monroe-Miller Co. v. Stokes, 9 Misc. Rep. 170; Fuller v. Tuska, 43 N. Y. St. Repr. 523.

Levehtbitt and Clabice, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bischoff, P. J.

An appeal from an interlocutory judgment lies to the General Term (Code, § 3189), but not to the Supreme Court from the determination of the General Term upon that appeal, where final judgment is not directed. Code, § 3191, subd. 1; Monroe-Miller Co. v. Stokes, 9 Misc. Rep. 170; Fuller v. Tuska, 43 N. Y. St. Repr. 523.

Levehtbitt and Clabice, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Misc. 518, 69 N.Y.S. 973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levy-v-metropolitan-street-railway-co-nyappterm-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack