Levy v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
This text of 115 A.D.2d 584 (Levy v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated February 25, 1985, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to strike defendants’ affirmative defense as a sanction for failure to serve a timely bill of particulars in compliance with a prior disclosure order of the same court, dated October 30, 1984.
Order affirmed, with costs.
Initially, we note that the order is appealable (see, Marrocco v Marrocco, 90 AD2d 989). However, we cannot say that Special Term abused its discretion in imposing the sanction of striking the affirmative defense rather than issuing a conditional order of preclusion. Thompson, J. P., O’Connor, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 A.D.2d 584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levy-v-manhattan-bronx-surface-transit-operating-authority-nyappdiv-1985.