Levy v. Levy

135 F.2d 663, 77 U.S. App. D.C. 382, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3347
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMay 10, 1943
DocketNo. 8379
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 135 F.2d 663 (Levy v. Levy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Levy v. Levy, 135 F.2d 663, 77 U.S. App. D.C. 382, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3347 (D.C. Cir. 1943).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 73(b), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, requires that a notice of appeal “designate •the judgment or part thereof appealed from.” Appellants wholly failed to comply -with this requirement. In some cases this would be a formal and not necessarily fatal . defect.1 But in this case orders of various sorts were entered at various times, and the -defect makes it impossible to decide either whether the appeal is timely or whether -it is from an appealable order. Since the .appeal, in any view, is without merit, it would be gratuitous to make assumptions in order to find that it is properly before us.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 F.2d 663, 77 U.S. App. D.C. 382, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levy-v-levy-cadc-1943.