Levy v. Kaufman

26 Misc. 2d 57, 219 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2057
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 8, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 Misc. 2d 57 (Levy v. Kaufman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Levy v. Kaufman, 26 Misc. 2d 57, 219 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2057 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A primary obligation to support a child rests upon the father. The services rendered by plaintiff were necessaries and defendant is obligated to pay a legal fee to plaintiff for the considerable work done by plaintiff in obtaining the support order in the Domestic Relations Court.

It was error to deny plaintiff’s application for summary judgment to the extent at least of ordering an assessment for the purpose of ascertaining the amount to be awarded plaintiff as a reasonable fee for his services.

The order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted to the extent of directing an assessment for the purpose of ascertaining the amount to be awarded plaintiff as a reasonable fee. Defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment denied. No appeal lies from the order of reference, an intermediate order, and the appeal therefrom is dismissed.

Concur — -Hecht, J. P., Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marcia D. v. Donald D.
85 Misc. 2d 637 (New York Family Court, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Misc. 2d 57, 219 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levy-v-kaufman-nyappterm-1960.