Levy v. Isaacs

285 A.D. 1170, 140 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7039
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 16, 1955
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 285 A.D. 1170 (Levy v. Isaacs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Levy v. Isaacs, 285 A.D. 1170, 140 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7039 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Opinion

In an action by a broker to recover commissions for the sale of real property, pursuant to a written agreement, defendant (the former owner) appeals from an order upon reargument, denying his motion for judgment on the pleadings and for summary judgment. Order of the City Court of Mount Vernon modified by striking from the ordering paragraph everything following the word “ defendant” and by substituting therefor the words “for judgment on the pleadings he and the same hereby is granted, and in all other respects denied.” As so modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. The complaint alleges that plaintiff was employed as the “ sole and exclusive agent ” of defendant for the sale of defendant’s property. This created an exclusive agency as distinguished from an exclusive right of sale. Under an exclusive agency agreement, an owner may make a sale himself, without the broker’s [1171]*1171aid, and, if the sale is made in good faith to a purchaser not procured by the broker, the owner does not become liable for commissions to the broker. {Werner V. Eurieh, 263 App. Div. 744; Slattery v. Cothran, 210 App. Div. 583!,. and cases cited therein.) Plaintiff does not allege that he procured the purchaser or participated in any manner, directly or indirectly, in the negotiations'.- Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Beldock and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morpheus Capital Advisors LLC v. UBS AG
15 N.E.3d 1187 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
Nicholas v. Bursley
119 So. 2d 722 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Ackman v. Toren, Inc.
6 A.D.2d 427 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
285 A.D. 1170, 140 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levy-v-isaacs-nyappdiv-1955.