Levy v. Goldman
This text of 252 A.D. 781 (Levy v. Goldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action for damages on alleged fraud in relation to stock ownership of a business. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The complaint was dismissed before the plaintiff rested. The court’s action was premature, and may not be upheld. (Shapiro v. Frankel [Appeal No. 1], 243 App. Div. 618.) Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 781, 299 N.Y.S. 158, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levy-v-goldman-nyappdiv-1937.