Levy v. Curtis

1 Abb. N. Cas. 189
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Abb. N. Cas. 189 (Levy v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Levy v. Curtis, 1 Abb. N. Cas. 189 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1876).

Opinion

Van Vorst, J.

[After stating the pleadings].—The demurrer admits that the allegations in the complaint are true, and that they disclose a breach by the defendants, of their engagement with the plaintiff, in their refusal to pay the drafts, and in their allowing them to [191]*191be protested for non-payment. When they authorized the plaintiff to draw for his expenses, they undertook to honor and pay the drafts. When there is a valid contract, and it has been broken, the plaintiff must be entitled to recover such damages as necessarily ensue from the non-performance or breach. These are general damages, and they need not be expressly detailed in the complaint, and are recoverable under the common conclusion.

It may be that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover the special damages, claimed by him in the complaint, nor is this decision to be regarded as an authority in their favor.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coppola v. Kraushaar
102 A.D. 306 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Abb. N. Cas. 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levy-v-curtis-nysupct-1876.