Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Levy v. Coy, Hunt & Co.

Levy v. Coy, Hunt & Co.

64 Misc. 39, 117 N.Y.S. 949
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 64 Misc. 39 (Levy v. Coy, Hunt & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Levy v. Coy, Hunt & Co., 64 Misc. 39, 117 N.Y.S. 949 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

MacLean, J.

The appeal of the plaintiff from the order herein, directing that “ the attorneys for the plaintiff serve upon the defendant’s attorney a written notice, giving the place last known to the plaintiff’s attorneys as the plaintiff’s address,” must be sustained; as it appears from the record that judgment has been entered upon a verdict in favor of the defendant and that no appeal has been taken therefrom within the time required by law. The action was ended, and the power to compel disclosure no longer existed, whatever the form of the papers in the motion or upon this appeal. Walton v. Fairchild, 4 N. Y. Supp. 552. The order must, therefore, be reversed.

Gtldebsleeve and Seabuey, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Potamkin Cadillac Corp. v. Karmgard
100 Misc. 2d 627 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1979)
In re the Appointment of a Guardian for Jacqueline F.
391 N.E.2d 967 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
Dike v. Dike
448 P.2d 490 (Washington Supreme Court, 1968)
In Re Illidge
91 P.2d 1100 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 Misc. 39, 117 N.Y.S. 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levy-v-coy-hunt-co-nyappterm-1909.