Levy v. Brooklyn Fire Insurance
25 Wend. 687
Opinion
said, that without attempting to lay down any general rule as to the reference of actions on policies of insurance, he was of opinion that in a case involving such serious charges as were here brought against the plaintiff, a party was entitled to the benefit of a trial before a court and jury, and that therefore he would direct the order for reference to be vacated.
Ordered accordingly.
See 6 Wendell, 503: 19 Id. 22 and 110; and 1 Hall’s R. 560.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Levy v. Brooklyn Fire Insurance, 25 Wend. 687 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1841).
25 Wend. 687 (Levy v. Brooklyn Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brink v. Republic Fire Insurance
2 Thomp. & Cook 550 (New York Supreme Court, 1874)
Batchelor v. Albany City Insurance
6 Abb. Pr. 240 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1869)
McLean v. East River Insurance
8 Bosw. 700 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1861)
Freeman v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance
13 Abb. Pr. 124 (New York Supreme Court, 1861)
Terry v. Hunter
3 How. Pr. 183 (New York Supreme Court, 1848)