Levy v. Bloch
This text of 126 A.D. 943 (Levy v. Bloch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order should be modified by giving leave to the appellant to renew the motion after obtaining the consent of the United States District Court to an application for the appointment of a receiver of the rents and profits of the property involved in this action, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Laughlin, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Order modified as stated in memorandum, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 A.D. 943, 111 N.Y.S. 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levy-v-bloch-nyappdiv-1908.