Levy v. Ben's Appetizing Grocery Shop, Inc.
This text of 246 A.D. 588 (Levy v. Ben's Appetizing Grocery Shop, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff Etta Levy, by reason of her falling through an opening in the floor leading to the cellar of a store operated by defendant, the trap-door of which was open, and for loss of services by her husband, Leo Levy. Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that it was error for the court to refuse to charge the following requests: “ That if the [589]*589jury finds that that trap-door was not opened while the plaintiff was standing behind that counter for those two minutes, as she has testified, then the accident has not happened substantially in the manner in which she has testified, and in that event, they must find for the defendant. * * * That merely submitting the case to them and denying my motions does not mean that the plaintiff must recover.’’ Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levy-v-bens-appetizing-grocery-shop-inc-nyappdiv-1935.