Levy v. Anderson

Alabama Court of Appeals

Levy v. Anderson

146 So. 922, 25 Ala. App. 651

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided March 21, 1933·No. 2 Div. 503.·Published

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

The appeal was taken in this ease on December 5, 1931. Appellant appears to have taken no action in this court to prosecute same to a conclusion.

On November 3, 1932, appellee submitted a motion to strike what purports to be a bill *652 of exceptions contained in the transcript. This motion is hereby granted, on the same grounds, and for the same reason, found stated in the opinion in the case of Turner v. Thornton, 192 Ala. 98, 68 So. 813.

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Motion granted. Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, Judge.

The appeal was taken in this ease on December 5, 1931. Appellant appears to have taken no action in this court to prosecute same to a conclusion.

On November 3, 1932, appellee submitted a motion to strike what purports to be a bill *652 of exceptions contained in the transcript. This motion is hereby granted, on the same grounds, and for the same reason, found stated in the opinion in the case of Turner v. Thornton, 192 Ala. 98, 68 So. 813.

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Motion granted. Appeal dismissed.

Levy v. Anderson, 146 So. 922, 25 Ala. App. 651 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

146 So. 922 (Levy v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related