Levoyant v. State

561 So. 2d 343, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2657, 1990 WL 48634
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 20, 1990·No. No. 89-02507·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. We agree with the trial court that the defendant was not shown to have standing to file the motion. The term of incarceration to which he had been sentenced had been completed. While he apparently was subject to a detainer issued by the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the trial court having recommended his deportation following his incarceration, there was no showing that as a result thereof he continued to be held in state custody and was in such custody at the time his 3.850 motion was filed. See Bolyea v. State, 508 So.2d 457, 458 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), approved, State v. Bolyea, 520 So.2d 562 (Fla.1988). See also D’Ambrosio v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 710 F.Supp. 269 (N.D.Cal.1989).

Affirmed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Levoyant v. State, 561 So. 2d 343, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2657, 1990 WL 48634 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

561 So. 2d 343 (Levoyant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Howard
49 Fla. Supp. 2d 38 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1991)
Gallo v. State
571 So. 2d 78 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)