Levoy v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Levoy v. State

179 So. 391, 28 Ala. App. 94, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 58

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 22, 1938

Docket7 Div. 323.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 So. 391 (Levoy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levoy v. State, 179 So. 391, 28 Ala. App. 94, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 58 (Ala. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.'

There is no bill of exceptions, therefore, charges requested based upon the evidence will not be considered.

The complaint was in two counts. The first of which charged that the defendant did possess, keep, own, set up, operate, or conduct, or did permit to be set up, operated, or conducted a gambling device, contrary to law. The second count charged that the defendant “did set up, carry on, or operate a wheel of fortune, slot machine, or a device of chance,” etc.

No demurrers were interposed to the indictment, and it is now contended that the-indictment is void and will not support a conviction.

*95 Without discussing the merits of the contention regarding the first count of the indictment, the contention of the defendant must fail, for the reason that no question of merit is raised as to the second count. This count, undoubtedly, charges an offense under section 4238 of the Code of 1923 with sufficient certainty, and the verdict of the jury, generally, will be referred to the good count.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI