Levola v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Levola v. Fischer

87 A.D.3d 1191, 929 N.Y.2d 510

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 87 A.D.3d 1191 (Levola v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levola v. Fischer, 87 A.D.3d 1191, 929 N.Y.2d 510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Petitioner, an inmate, brought this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging certain determinations denying his grievances related to his removal from the Sex Offender Counseling and Treatment Program as well as a determination withholding good time because of such removal. Petitioner has appealed Supreme Court’s dismissal of the petition. The Attorney General, however, has advised this Court that petitioner was released from custody on February 26, 2011, his maximum expiration date. In view of this, the appeal is now moot with respect to all of the determinations at issue (see Matter of Johnson v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 70 AD3d 1081 [2010]; Matter of La Tour v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs. Cent. Off. Review Comm., 5 AD3d 890, 891 [2004]). Accordingly, it must be dismissed.

Peters, J.P., Spain, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitioner, an inmate, brought this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging certain determinations denying his grievances related to his removal from the Sex Offender Counseling and Treatment Program as well as a determination withholding good time because of such removal. Petitioner has appealed Supreme Court’s dismissal of the petition. The Attorney General, however, has advised this Court that petitioner was released from custody on February 26, 2011, his maximum expiration date. In view of this, the appeal is now moot with respect to all of the determinations at issue (see Matter of Johnson v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 70 AD3d 1081 [2010]; Matter of La Tour v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs. Cent. Off. Review Comm., 5 AD3d 890, 891 [2004]). Accordingly, it must be dismissed.

Peters, J.P., Spain, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.D.3d 1191, 929 N.Y.2d 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levola-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack