Levitt v. Levitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Levitt v. Levitt

18 A.D.2d 1051, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4248

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 5, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 1051 (Levitt v. Levitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levitt v. Levitt, 18 A.D.2d 1051, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4248 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Order insofar as it grants the motion of plaintiff Seymour Levitt for summary judgment in Action No. 2 and insofar as it denies the motion of defendant Harriet Levitt for summary judgment in Action No. 2 unanimously reversed on the law and facts and Harriet Levitt’s motion, as defendant in Action No. 2, granted and complaint in Action No. 2 dismissed, and otherwise order affirmed. See Memorandum filed in companion ease of Levitt v. Levitt (18 A D 2d 1051). (Appeal by Harriet Levitt from order of Erie Special Term denying the motions of plaintiff in Action No. 1 and defendant in Action No. 2 for partial summary judgment in Action No. 1 and for dismissal of the complaint in Action No. 2.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, MeClusky and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order insofar as it grants the motion of plaintiff Seymour Levitt for summary judgment in Action No. 2 and insofar as it denies the motion of defendant Harriet Levitt for summary judgment in Action No. 2 unanimously reversed on the law and facts and Harriet Levitt’s motion, as defendant in Action No. 2, granted and complaint in Action No. 2 dismissed, and otherwise order affirmed. See Memorandum filed in companion ease of Levitt v. Levitt (18 A D 2d 1051). (Appeal by Harriet Levitt from order of Erie Special Term denying the motions of plaintiff in Action No. 1 and defendant in Action No. 2 for partial summary judgment in Action No. 1 and for dismissal of the complaint in Action No. 2.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, MeClusky and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 1051, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levitt-v-levitt-nyappdiv-1963.