Levitt v. Incorporated Village of Sands Point

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Levitt v. Incorporated Village of Sands Point

3 A.D.2d 679, 159 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6608

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 3 A.D.2d 679 (Levitt v. Incorporated Village of Sands Point) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levitt v. Incorporated Village of Sands Point, 3 A.D.2d 679, 159 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6608 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to declare amendments to a local zoning ordinance unconstitutional and ineffective, the appeal is from an order denying a motion made on October 1,1956 to sever the first cause of action, which this court on appeal had held to be sufficient, from the third and fourth causes, which this court on appeal had dismissed for insufficiency. The motion to sever was made on the ground that severance was necessary in order that a prospective appeal to the Court of Appeals might be taken from that part of our order which dismissed the third and fourth causes of action. On July 23. 1956 this court denied an application for leave to take such appeal. (2 A D 2d 781.) Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The Special Term properly held that only one cause of action remains and that there are no causes which are severable in the present state of the record. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to declare amendments to a local zoning ordinance unconstitutional and ineffective, the appeal is from an order denying a motion made on October 1,1956 to sever the first cause of action, which this court on appeal had held to be sufficient, from the third and fourth causes, which this court on appeal had dismissed for insufficiency. The motion to sever was made on the ground that severance was necessary in order that a prospective appeal to the Court of Appeals might be taken from that part of our order which dismissed the third and fourth causes of action. On July 23. 1956 this court denied an application for leave to take such appeal. (2 A D 2d 781.) Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The Special Term properly held that only one cause of action remains and that there are no causes which are severable in the present state of the record. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.2d 679, 159 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levitt-v-incorporated-village-of-sands-point-nyappdiv-1957.