Levitt v. Fairfield Resorts, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Levitt v. Fairfield Resorts, Inc.

857 A.2d 1128, 383 Md. 209, 2004 Md. LEXIS 595

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided September 15, 2004·No. No. 65·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM ORDER

The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above captioned case, it is this 15th day of September, 2004,

[210] ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County be, and it is hereby, vacated, and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinions in Levitt v. Fax.com, Inc., 383 Md. 141, 857 A.2d 1089 (No. 21, September Term, 2003, filed September 13, 2004) and Ponte Architects, Ltd. v. Investors’ Alert, Inc., 382 Md. 689, 857 A.2d 1 (2004). Costs to be paid by the DefendantAppellee, Fairfield Resorts, Inc.

/s/ ROBERT M. BELL

Chief Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM ORDER

The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above captioned case, it is this 15th day of September, 2004,

[210] ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County be, and it is hereby, vacated, and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinions in Levitt v. Fax.com, Inc., 383 Md. 141, 857 A.2d 1089 (No. 21, September Term, 2003, filed September 13, 2004) and Ponte Architects, Ltd. v. Investors’ Alert, Inc., 382 Md. 689, 857 A.2d 1 (2004). Costs to be paid by the DefendantAppellee, Fairfield Resorts, Inc.

/s/ ROBERT M. BELL

Chief Judge

Levitt v. Fairfield Resorts, Inc., 857 A.2d 1128, 383 Md. 209, 2004 Md. LEXIS 595 (Md. 2004).

Pincite

857 A.2d 1128 (Levitt v. Fairfield Resorts, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related