Levitt v. Fairfield Resorts, Inc.
This text of 857 A.2d 1128 (Levitt v. Fairfield Resorts, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above captioned case, it is this 15th day of September, 2004,
[210]*210ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County be, and it is hereby, vacated, and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinions in Levitt v. Fax.com, Inc., 383 Md. 141, 857 A.2d 1089 (No. 21, September Term, 2003, filed September 13, 2004) and Ponte Architects, Ltd. v. Investors’ Alert, Inc., 382 Md. 689, 857 A.2d 1 (2004). Costs to be paid by the DefendantAppellee, Fairfield Resorts, Inc.
/s/ ROBERT M. BELL
Chief Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
857 A.2d 1128, 383 Md. 209, 2004 Md. LEXIS 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levitt-v-fairfield-resorts-inc-md-2004.