Levitan Lumber Co. v. Yegendorf

Appellate Court of Illinois

Levitan Lumber Co. v. Yegendorf

191 Ill. App. 454

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedFebruary 24, 1915

DocketGen. No. 19,723

StatusPublished

This text of 191 Ill. App. 454 (Levitan Lumber Co. v. Yegendorf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levitan Lumber Co. v. Yegendorf, 191 Ill. App. 454 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Sales, § 332*—when judgment for value of goods sold must he reversed. Where in an action to recover for the reasonable value of lumber alleged to have been sold and delivered to defendant there was no evidence whatever of quantity, quality or value of same, a judgment in favor of plaintiff must be reversed, there being no contention that a price was agreed upon between the parties. 3. Sales, § 327*—what evidence insufficient to prove quantity and value of goods sold. In an action for the reasonable value of goods alleged to have been sold to defendant, proof merely of the amount of the bill entered on plaintiff’s books is insufficient to prove the quantity, quality or value of the goods sold.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Sales, § 332*—when judgment for value of goods sold must he reversed. Where in an action to recover for the reasonable value of lumber alleged to have been sold and delivered to defendant there was no evidence whatever of quantity, quality or value of same, a judgment in favor of plaintiff must be reversed, there being no contention that a price was agreed upon between the parties. 3. Sales, § 327*—what evidence insufficient to prove quantity and value of goods sold. In an action for the reasonable value of goods alleged to have been sold to defendant, proof merely of the amount of the bill entered on plaintiff’s books is insufficient to prove the quantity, quality or value of the goods sold.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 Ill. App. 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levitan-lumber-co-v-yegendorf-illappct-1915.