Levister v. State

93 S.E. 513, 21 Ga. App. 50, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 418
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 24, 1917
Docket8924
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 93 S.E. 513 (Levister v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Levister v. State, 93 S.E. 513, 21 Ga. App. 50, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 418 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Ltjke, J.

“To sustain a conviction [in a felony case] upon the testimony of an accomplice, there must be corroborating circumstances which, in themselves and independently of the testimony of the accomplice, directly connect the defendant with the crime, or lead to inference that he is guilty.” Stokes v. State, 19 Ga. App. 235 (91 S. E. 271). The evidence offered to corroborate the testimony of the accomplice did not directly connect the accused with the crime, and therefore it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Wade, O. J., and George, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wiggins v. State
55 S.E.2d 842 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Thompson v. State
182 S.E. 414 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Adams v. State
105 S.E. 248 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 S.E. 513, 21 Ga. App. 50, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levister-v-state-gactapp-1917.