Levis v. H. Edmonds
294 S.W. 1119, 1927 Tex. App. LEXIS 341
Opinion
This case originated in the justice court. The defendant in error sued, and recovered a judgment against the plaintiff in error for $150. The pase was tried in the court below without a jury. The sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment is the principal question presented in this appeal. The testimony was conflicting, but there is enough to support the judgment rendered, and the judgment will be accordingly affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Levis v. H. Edmonds, 294 S.W. 1119, 1927 Tex. App. LEXIS 341 (Tex. Ct. App. 1927).
294 S.W. 1119 (Levis v. H. Edmonds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.