Levinson v. Rosenheim Shoe Co.

85 S.E. 764, 143 Ga. 584, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 533
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 23, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 85 S.E. 764 (Levinson v. Rosenheim Shoe Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Levinson v. Rosenheim Shoe Co., 85 S.E. 764, 143 Ga. 584, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 533 (Ga. 1915).

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

The question involved was whether a waiver of homestead was a mere general waiver, disconnected from the creation of an indebtedness, so as to fall within the ruling in Ragan v. Taff, 134 Ga. 835 (68 S. E. 579), or whether the waiver was made in connection with the creation of the indebtedness and contemporaneously therewith, within a proper construction of that expression as used in the Civil Code (1910), § 3413, so as to fall within the ruling in Pincus v. Meinhard, 139 Ga. 365 (77 S. E. 82). That question was submitted to the jury, who found that the waiver was valid. The evidence authorized such a finding; and no error being complained of in the rulings of the judge pending the trial, a motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence, was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frank & Co. v. Weiner
147 S.E. 51 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 S.E. 764, 143 Ga. 584, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levinson-v-rosenheim-shoe-co-ga-1915.