Levins v. Fulton Specialty Co.
122 A. 343, 99 N.J.L. 280, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 203
Opinion
■ The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief J ustice, Tkenciiard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, White, Heppenheimer, Van Buskirk, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Levins v. Fulton Specialty Co., 122 A. 343, 99 N.J.L. 280, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 203 (N.J. 1923).
122 A. 343 (Levins v. Fulton Specialty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Montgomery v. Abex Corp.
602 A.2d 290 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
Torres v. Miller
569 A.2d 301 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1990)
Hajnas v. Engelhard Min. & Chem. Co.
555 A.2d 716 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1989)
New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co. v. Blau
475 A.2d 1278 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1984)
Verra v. Mayor and Council of Hoboken
175 A.2d 665 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Patasky v. Singer Manufacturing Co.
7 N.J. Misc. 253 (New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 1929)