Levingsworth v. Fox

2 S.C.L. 520
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedJuly 1, 1804
StatusPublished

This text of 2 S.C.L. 520 (Levingsworth v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Levingsworth v. Fox, 2 S.C.L. 520 (S.C. Ct. App. 1804).

Opinion

Upon this ground the court, after argument, ordered a new trial, as fraud is never to be presumed, unless the circumstances are so strong as to leave no doubt to the contrary, as was determined in the case of Rutherford v. The Sheriff of Charleston District, in 1801; and also because one Rountree, a witness produced by the plaintiff on the trial, appeared, since the cause was tried, to be deeply interested in the event of the suit, (having a claim to part of she same lands in dispute,) although in court he swore upon his voir dire, that he was not in the least interested in the case, one way or the other.

Rule for new trial made absolute.

Present, Gkzmke, Waties, Bay, Brevard and Lee, fudges.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 S.C.L. 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levingsworth-v-fox-scctapp-1804.