Levine v. Walsh
This text of 271 A.D.2d 786 (Levine v. Walsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for an order, under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, directing the respondents, a Justice of the Supreme Court, and the County Clerk of Kings County, respectively, to subscribe and enter a proposed interlocutory judgment of annulment in a matrimonial action, denied, without costs. Under the facts and circumstances of this case mandamus does not lie. (Himmelstein v. Himmelstein, 186 Mise. 964.) (Hos. 561, 562.) In view of the- decision of motion Ho. 560, decided herewith, respondents’ motions to dismiss the petition are dismissed, without costs. Present— Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Aldrich, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 A.D.2d 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levine-v-walsh-nyappdiv-1946.