Levine v. Sun Bank/South Florida, N.A.
546 So. 2d 1127, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1711, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3993, 1989 WL 78339
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 19, 1989·No. No. 88-1534·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The trial court reversibly erred by refusing leave to amend the complaint where such leave was requested after the filing of a motion for judgment on the pleadings but prior to entry of an order on the motion. See Bradham v. Hayes Enterprises, Inc., 306 So.2d 568 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).
REVERSED AND REMANDED for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Levine v. Sun Bank/South Florida, N.A., 546 So. 2d 1127, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1711, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3993, 1989 WL 78339 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
546 So. 2d 1127 (Levine v. Sun Bank/South Florida, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
PWBC, LLC. v. Palm Vista Homeowners Association, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025