Levine v. Sun Bank/South Florida, N.A.

546 So. 2d 1127, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1711, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3993, 1989 WL 78339
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 19, 1989
DocketNo. 88-1534
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 546 So. 2d 1127 (Levine v. Sun Bank/South Florida, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Levine v. Sun Bank/South Florida, N.A., 546 So. 2d 1127, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1711, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3993, 1989 WL 78339 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court reversibly erred by refusing leave to amend the complaint where such leave was requested after the filing of a motion for judgment on the pleadings but prior to entry of an order on the motion. See Bradham v. Hayes Enterprises, Inc., 306 So.2d 568 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

REVERSED AND REMANDED for further proceedings consistent herewith.

WALDEN, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

PWBC, LLC. v. Palm Vista Homeowners Association, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
546 So. 2d 1127, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1711, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3993, 1989 WL 78339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levine-v-sun-banksouth-florida-na-fladistctapp-1989.