Levine v. State

776 So. 2d 992, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 248, 2001 WL 38013
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 17, 2001·No. No. 4D00-2374·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the State concedes error, we reverse and remand for resentencing. The State acknowledges that the Appellant was entitled to be present at a resentenc-[993]*993ing hearing resulting from the application of Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000).

GUNTHER, POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Levine v. State, 776 So. 2d 992, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 248, 2001 WL 38013 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

776 So. 2d 992 (Levine v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryant v. State
796 So. 2d 1229 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Jones v. State
781 So. 2d 480 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)