Levine v. Public Bank

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Levine v. Public Bank

132 N.Y.S. 330

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 132 N.Y.S. 330 (Levine v. Public Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Levine v. Public Bank, 132 N.Y.S. 330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

At the close of the plaintiffs’, case the defendant rested, without presenting any evidence. The trial justice then stated: >

“You have not proven the amount claimed to be due, that I can see. The relations of debtor and creditor have not been established, and there is no proof of any proper demand.”

We agree with the learned .trial justice that there is a failure of proof on the part of the depositor of the balance due, and also of any proper demand upon the bank for that balance.

“Judgment that the action be dismissed with costs without prejudice to a new action shall be rendered in the following cases: * * * (4) Where the plaintiff does not prove his cause of action.” Section 248, Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902, c. 580).

The trial justice had no authority to give judgment absolute for defendant. Egyptian Flag Cigarette Co. v. Comiskey, 40 Misc. Rep. 236, 81 N. Y. Supp. 673.

Judgment modified, by providing that the words “without prejudice to a new action” shall be inserted therein, and, as thus modified, affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

At the close of the plaintiffs’, case the defendant rested, without presenting any evidence. The trial justice then stated: >

“You have not proven the amount claimed to be due, that I can see. The relations of debtor and creditor have not been established, and there is no proof of any proper demand.”

We agree with the learned .trial justice that there is a failure of proof on the part of the depositor of the balance due, and also of any proper demand upon the bank for that balance.

“Judgment that the action be dismissed with costs without prejudice to a new action shall be rendered in the following cases: * * * (4) Where the plaintiff does not prove his cause of action.” Section 248, Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902, c. 580).

The trial justice had no authority to give judgment absolute for defendant. Egyptian Flag Cigarette Co. v. Comiskey, 40 Misc. Rep. 236, 81 N. Y. Supp. 673.

Judgment modified, by providing that the words “without prejudice to a new action” shall be inserted therein, and, as thus modified, affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 N.Y.S. 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levine-v-public-bank-nyappterm-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack