Levine v. Products Manufacturing Co.
This text of 217 A.D. 762 (Levine v. Products Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion for consolidation of actions affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The cases sought to be consolidated have nothing in common save the fact that they arise out of the same accident and that the various plaintiffs are represented by one attorney. One is a death case where different principles of law would apply, and another is an action to recover for damage to property. The remaining action is to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in the collision. Just how the injuries were sustained, whether the plaintiff was a pedestrian or whether he was on one of the vehicles as a driver [763]*763or a guest, is not made clear. The issues to be determined are not the same in each action and a decision in one would not be conclusive in either of the others. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 A.D. 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/levine-v-products-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1926.