Levine v. Nowell

153 S.E.2d 729, 115 Ga. App. 79, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 1007
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 11, 1967·No. 42461·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Eberhardt, Judge.

Conceding, but without deciding, that the evidence demanded a finding that the defendant was negligent and that this negligence was the proximate cause of the automobile collision, the evidence authorized but.did not demand a finding that plaintiff had suffered any injury attributable to the collision. The jury is the judge of the veracity of parties and witnesses; under the evidence in this record they were authorized to disbelieve plaintiff’s claim of injury as a result of the collision. Accordingly the judgment for defendant, based upon the verdict of the jury, will [80] not be disturbed. Miller v. Dean, 113 Ga. App. 869 (1) (150 SE2d 191).

Felton, C. J., and Hall, J., concur. Argued January 3, 1967 Decided January 11, 1967 Rehearing denied January 23, 1967. Edenfield, Heyman & Sizemore, Newell Edenfield, Benjamin H. Oehlert, III, for appellant. Long, Weinberg & Ansley, Palmer H. Ansley, for appellee.

Judgment- affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Levine v. Nowell, 153 S.E.2d 729, 115 Ga. App. 79, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 1007 (Ga. Ct. App. 1967).

153 S.E.2d 729 (Levine v. Nowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jarrett v. Parker
217 S.E.2d 337 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Hiter v. Shelp
216 S.E.2d 666 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)