Levine v. Nowell
Opinion
Conceding, but without deciding, that the evidence demanded a finding that the defendant was negligent and that this negligence was the proximate cause of the automobile collision, the evidence authorized but.did not demand a finding that plaintiff had suffered any injury attributable to the collision. The jury is the judge of the veracity of parties and witnesses; under the evidence in this record they were authorized to disbelieve plaintiff’s claim of injury as a result of the collision. Accordingly the judgment for defendant, based upon the verdict of the jury, will [80] not be disturbed. Miller v. Dean, 113 Ga. App. 869 (1) (150 SE2d 191).
Judgment- affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
153 S.E.2d 729 (Levine v. Nowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.